SAML versus OpenID Connect: Choose the right SSO protocol
In brief
The guide title now uses quoted punctuation, and the table separator spacing was standardized.
What Entra admins need to know
No administrator action is required.
This editorial summary was generated by AI from the documentation changes. Verify important details in the full Microsoft Learn article.
Documentation change
The comparison below shows only the changed extract. Use the full-page view for complete context.
title: "SAML versus OpenID Connect -Connect: Choose the right SSO protocol"
description: Compare SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) protocols to choose the right approach for your application's SSO integration with Microsoft Entra ID.
author: omondiatieno The following table compares SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect across the factors that matter most for SSO integration.
| Aspect | SAML 2.0 | OpenID Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Message format | XML-based | JSON-based |
| Token type | XML assertions | JWT tokens |
| Enterprise adoption | Widely established | Growing rapidly |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ ----title: SAML versus OpenID Connect - Choose the right SSO protocol+title: "SAML versus OpenID Connect: Choose the right SSO protocol" description: Compare SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) protocols to choose the right approach for your application's SSO integration with Microsoft Entra ID. author: omondiatieno@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ OIDC is simpler and more developer-friendly. It fits modern app designs, includi The following table compares SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect across the factors that matter most for SSO integration. | Aspect | SAML 2.0 | OpenID Connect |-|--------|----------|----------------|+| -------- | ---------- | ---------------- | | **Message format** | XML-based | JSON-based | | **Token type** | XML assertions | JWT tokens | | **Enterprise adoption** | Widely established | Growing rapidly | 